AjaxTeam hub

Eredivisie Analysis · Ajax

Five Midfielders Started; Two Ajax Substitutes Finished

Ajax's five-midfielder base controlled Atalanta before Tolu and Abdellah Ouazane scored late. Míchel should preserve the division of labor, not freeze the eleven.

The starters built an unfinished match

Ajax started five midfielders. The two players who scored in the 2-0 win over Atalanta started on the bench. That invites a simple conclusion: Míchel Sánchez fixed the match with substitutions. It is only half the accounting.

The starting structure used Oscar Gloukh, Julian Brandt and Davy Klaassen ahead of Sofyan Amrabat and Jorthy Mokio. AS described those five midfielders as the key to the control, with full-backs Lucas Rosa and Owen Wijndal providing the more aggressive width. Rosa hit the post early; Brandt was denied after halftime. Tolu Arokodare and Abdellah Ouazane then came from the bench to score in the 87th and 90+3rd minutes. Ajax created the unfinished match before the bench supplied its ending.

That distinction should guide the next selection. A club with Ajax's roster does not need to choose between a clever starting eleven and useful substitutes as though one invalidates the other. It needs a clear division of labor, which is cheaper and much more effective than asking eleven interchangeable creators to solve every phase.

Five midfielders did not mean five copies

The lineup worked because the midfield labels concealed different jobs. Amrabat and Mokio guarded the base. Gloukh, Brandt and Klaassen occupied higher spaces and helped Ajax keep Atalanta from turning every turnover into a race. The full-backs then supplied the width that the nominal midfield crowd did not.

That is an important squad-planning detail. Accumulating attacking midfielders often looks like depth until three of them request the same pocket and the full-back receives the ball with nobody stretching the next line. Against Atalanta, Ajax gave the central technicians a floor underneath them and a lane outside them. The arrangement did not create an early goal, but it did create repeated access: Rosa's deflected shot hit the upright, Marcos Leonardo and Mokio went close before halftime, and Brandt threatened after the restart.

The bench changed the demand

Ouazane entered in the 62nd minute and Tolu in the 66th. Their purpose was not to perform the starters' jobs with fresher legs. They changed the question. Tolu gave Ajax a direct target against Relja Obrić; Ouazane attacked the area with the ball rather than waiting between lines for the next combination.

The first goal made the distinction obvious. Youri Baas sent a long ball over the top, Tolu won the position and finished one-on-one. The second began with another long delivery, this time from Marc-André ter Stegen. Tolu brought it down, and Ouazane drove in from the left before finishing from a tight angle off the underside of the bar.

Ajax did not betray the patient platform by going long. The platform made the direct play more dangerous because Atalanta had spent the night defending width, central numbers and repeated possession. By the 87th minute, one clean duel could finally alter the geometry.

Late goals can flatter every decision

The strongest counterargument is sitting on the clock. Ajax were scoreless for 86 minutes. Atalanta found moments after the hour, Klaassen risked a penalty with one challenge, and Football Italia noted that the visitors wasted counterattacking choices before the breakthrough. Obrić was also making only his second senior appearance when Tolu beat him for the opener.

So the win does not certify five midfielders as a permanent answer or every substitution as genius. Late goals have a habit of laundering the earlier frustration. Marcos Leonardo's missed chances and the long wait for a clean finish remain part of the audit.

The proper verdict is conditional. Keep the starting platform when the opponent can punish loose spacing. Keep Tolu and Ouazane as different tools rather than decorative depth. Change the timing when the match shows the central occupation is no longer creating a better chance. A bench is useful when it changes the demand, not when it repeats the lineup with new shirt numbers.

Midtjylland tests the division of labor

Ajax visit Midtjylland on 5 November. That match should not be treated as a referendum on whether the Atalanta eleven starts unchanged. The better test is whether Míchel preserves the jobs that made the late changes coherent.

Watch the first half for two things. Are the full-backs still allowed to provide width while the double base protects the turnover? Do the higher midfielders create enough access that a later direct option enters against defenders already forced to move? Then watch the timing of the bench. Tolu should not require the 87th minute to become a target, and Ouazane should not need stoppage time to attack an isolated full-back.

The 2-0 delivered Ajax's first Conference League points after the defeat at Hajduk Split. It also offered a roster principle worth more than the table movement: let the starters build the match and use the bench to change it. Midtjylland will reveal whether that division was a deliberate plan or merely a happy ending discovered just before the credits.

Keep the signal alive

What comes next

Follow the team or writer, then come back for the next consequential game and argument.

Your briefingKeep Ajax in view

New results and original stories will roll into My Sports.

Next on the calendarAjax at Sparta RotterdamOpen game center →More Ajax analysis · European CompetitionAdvancing Cannot Excuse Ajax's Control ProblemAjax survived Shelbourne and reached the Conference League playoff, but a 2-2 draw exposed how quickly rotation turns possession into disconnected individual decisions.Continue this topic →
Refresh this page ✕